Using InSAR in a trigger action response plan for mine geotechnical monitoring

Mining haul truck in a mine, representing geotechnical monitoring and TARP procedures

An InSAR-informed trigger action response plan (TARP) connects measured changes in ground movement to defined reviews and operational actions. InSAR is valuable for identifying broad or persistent deformation patterns and changes in trend across the whole mine, including areas without ground instruments. Its observation intervals and uncertainty mean it should not be treated as a universal rapid-failure alarm, so the TARP must be built around the mine's existing hazard assessment and monitoring responsibilities.

Define which hazards InSAR can inform

Different parts of a mine have different potential failure modes. A pit wall, haul road, waste dump and surrounding ground may each need a different monitoring strategy. Start by identifying what movement could indicate at each location and whether satellite radar has suitable viewing geometry and coherent targets there. A useful TARP also lists the locations that are not adequately observed, because an absence of data is not evidence of stability. You can read more about InSAR for slope and tailings monitoring on SkyGeo's InSAR for mining page.

InSAR is well suited to building long movement histories and identifying areas where a pattern has become unusual. Those observations support investigation priorities and changes to monitoring coverage. For hazards that develop faster than a usable satellite update, rapid response must come from other instruments and site processes.

Use context-dependent triggers

A single millimeters-per-year threshold rarely transfers safely from one site to another. A meaningful trigger can consider a departure from local historical behavior, acceleration across several reliable observations, the spatial extent of movement, agreement with nearby targets, data quality and known operational activity. It also depends on the consequences at that location.

Document how analysts handle ambiguity. For example, a point whose apparent change is similar in size to its uncertainty might trigger a technical quality review rather than an immediate operational response. A persistent pattern consistent with known geotechnical concerns may justify corroboration and a field assessment.

Attach a named response to each trigger

For every category of finding, specify who reviews it, how quickly, which other measurements are checked and what decision can follow. Typical pathways include continuing routine observation, requesting additional imagery or reprocessing, inspecting the affected area, installing or moving instruments and escalating to the mine's responsible geotechnical authority. The Kansanshi mine case study shows how InSAR measurements fed into a site-specific engineering response that reduced slope displacement.

A TARP should not turn a satellite-derived classification into an automatic evacuation instruction outside the mine's approved safety framework. Equally, if a credible, concerning observation arrives, responsibility for evaluating it must be clearly assigned, even though the measurement is remote.

Test the procedure before relying on it

Use historical examples, simulated findings and ambiguous cases to rehearse the process. Check whether information arrives in a usable format, whether responsibilities are clear and whether the proposed action is proportionate. Revisit thresholds when mine geometry, blasting, dewatering or ground conditions change.

At Kansanshi, observed slope movement contributed to an investigation and a subsequent intervention, a documented example of InSAR supporting engineering decisions on a mine slope.

Is InSAR an early warning system?

InSAR can contribute to early awareness of movement trends, but the term needs qualifying. A safety-critical warning system requires a deliberately designed combination of sensors, response times, thresholds, people and procedures suited to the hazard.

Frequently asked questions

Connect InSAR to your mine monitoring workflow

If your geotechnical team is reviewing its monitoring and escalation procedures, tell us about the site hazards and current instrumentation. Contact SkyGeo.

Previous
Previous

GISTM and tailings deformation monitoring: where satellite InSAR fits

Next
Next

Combining InSAR with GNSS, leveling, prisms and ground-based radar